Comments on: The porn-for-pay offer that wasn’t

By: Heather in Beautiful BC

Heather in Beautiful BC — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:52:19 +0000

Awwwwwwwww…. crap - a lousy scam - and here I was ready to earn some serious cash. Good job uncovering the deets, Skeet and keeping Twitter abuzz!

By: JMom

JMom — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:06:48 +0000

Ah well, I guess it was too good to be true but it sure was fun tweeting about it and imagining all that money rolling in

By: skeet

skeet — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:18:05 +0000

Loretta, Charles Ponzi ran his operation in the 1920s and scams that follow his scheme have been running ever since. They do seem to surge from time to time, though, so perhaps this one is the first of many to come. The sad thing is that they will always find gullible people and rope them in. My email didn’t come from the company - it came from some poor fool who bought into their hype.

By: Loretta

Loretta — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:45:25 +0000

Aw that totally sucks. Ponzi schemes are so 90s -lol- they aren’t even in the right spam generation, silly amatuer spammers. I’m glad it was just something dumb and easy to pass on.

By: skeet

skeet — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:10:37 +0000

Now Val - I posted pictures in jammies, pictures in bubbles, one picture with a bit of cleavage, but I’m totally not recalling showing off my underwhatwithall! I’m so embarrassed - must have been sleep-blogging at the time!

By: skeet

skeet — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:08:34 +0000

We did have some porny tweet fun, didn’t we, Lisa?

By: valmg

valmg — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:58:35 +0000

You go girl! Great detective work!
Shame on anyone who thinks you’d do porn. Although I have had the privilege of seeing you in your underwhatwithall. LOL.

By: Lisa

Lisa — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:57:03 +0000

I knew it sounded to good to be true Still, it made for an interesting evening on Twitter.